"a kind of information magpie, gathering to myself all manner of shiny scraps of fact and hokum and books and art-history and politics and music and film, and developing, too, a certain skill in manipulating and arranging these pitiful shards so that they glittered and caught the light. Fool’s gold, or priceless nuggets mined from my singular childhood’s rich bohemian seam? I leave it to others to decide."And so I thought of her today when I came across this particular impassioned piece of writing about writers, and I decided to gather it like an information magpie honing in on a glittering shard in honor of Jingy. I think most things that are different and interesting can also be considered a little insane. Well that's an insanity I'll take then.
****
Excerpt from Simone Weil by Susan Sontag:
"The culture-heroes of our liberal bourgeois civilization are anti-liberal and anti-bourgeois; they are writers who are repetitive, obsessive, and impolite, who impress by force—not simply by their tone of personal authority and by their intellectual ardor, but by the sense of acute personal and intellectual extremity. The bigots, the hysterics, the destroyers of the self—these are the writers who bear witness to the fearful polite time in which we live. It is mostly a matter of tone: it is hardly possible to give credence to ideas uttered in the impersonal tones of sanity. There are certain eras which are too complex, too deafened by contradictory historical and intellectual experiences, to hear the voice of sanity. Sanity becomes compromise, evasion, a lie. Ours is an age which consciously pursues health, and yet only believes in the reality of sickness. The truths we respect are those born of affliction. We measure truth in terms of the cost to the writer in suffering—rather than by the standard of an objective truth to which a writer’s words correspond. Each of our truths must have a martyr."
The New York Review of Books: Simone Weil (Susan Sontag)
3 comments:
"There are certain eras which are too complex, too deafened by contradictory historical and intellectual experiences, to hear the voice of sanity. Sanity becomes compromise, evasion, a lie."
This is both a gift and a curse for the writer. History is all chaotic and competing narrative. As observers we can study the past as academically as we want, but ultimately our opinions of history are not the sum of the facts that we studied. They inevitably spring from a few stories which grab us and tell us, "this is true." For me my view of revolutionary France will always be colored by Voltaire and the American South by Faulkner. Both voices compelling in their richness and absurdity, telling stories that are objectively insane but more true than any textbook could be.
Fascinating post, please keep them coming.
Very true. It's interesting how subjective reality can be - sometimes it's all about who tells the best story. Thanks for commenting NS :)
awww nan! <3 miss you so much.
you're MY muse
I love your glittering shards
and yes... these are some happy days :)
Post a Comment